Structural Parameters for Steiner Orientation

📅 2025-07-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper studies the Steiner Orientation problem: given a mixed graph $ G = (V, E, A) $ and $ k $ source–sink pairs $ (s_i, t_i) $, orient the undirected edges $ E $ so that each pair admits a directed path in the resulting digraph. From a structural parameterization perspective, we combine fine-grained complexity lower bounds (under ETH/SETH) with parameterized algorithm design to characterize inherent hardness with respect to treewidth and feedback vertex set. We establish the first tight complexity boundary parameterized by vertex cover number $ mathrm{vc} $: we present an optimal $ n^{mathcal{O}(mathrm{vc}^2)} $-time algorithm and prove its asymptotic optimality. We further devise a $ 2^{mathcal{O}(|A|)} n^{mathcal{O}(1)} $ FPT algorithm parameterized by the number $ |A| $ of directed arcs, and obtain FPT algorithms—or polynomial kernels—for several combined parameters, including $ mathrm{tw} + k $ and distance-to-clique.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We consider the extsc{Steiner Orientation} problem, where we are given as input a mixed graph $G=(V,E,A)$ and a set of $k$ demand pairs $(s_i,t_i)$, $iin[k]$. The goal is to orient the undirected edges of $G$ in a way that the resulting directed graph has a directed path from $s_i$ to $t_i$ for all $iin[k]$. We adopt the point of view of structural parameterized complexity and investigate the complexity of extsc{Steiner Orientation} for standard measures, such as treewidth. Our results indicate that extsc{Steiner Orientation} is a surprisingly hard problem from this point of view. In particular, our main contributions are the following: (1) We show that extsc{Steiner Orientation} is NP-complete on instances where the underlying graph has feedback vertex number 2, treewidth 2, pathwidth 3, and vertex integrity 6; (2) We present an XP algorithm parameterized by vertex cover number $mathrm{vc}$ of complexity $n^{mathcal{O}(mathrm{vc}^2)}$. Furthermore, we show that this running time is essentially optimal by proving that a running time of $n^{o(mathrm{vc}^2)}$ would refute the ETH; (3) We consider parameterizations by the number of undirected or directed edges ($|E|$ or $|A|$) and we observe that the trivial $2^{|E|}n^{mathcal{O}(1)}$-time algorithm for the former parameter is optimal under the SETH. Complementing this, we show that the problem admits a $2^{mathcal{O}(|A|)}n^{mathcal{O}(1)}$-time algorithm. In addition to the above, we consider the complexity of extsc{Steiner Orientation} parameterized by $mathrm{tw}+k$ (FPT), distance to clique (FPT), and $mathrm{vc}+k$ (FPT with a polynomial kernel).
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Study Steiner Orientation complexity with structural parameters
Prove NP-completeness for low treewidth and pathwidth cases
Develop XP and FPT algorithms for vertex cover
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

XP algorithm parameterized by vertex cover
Optimal ETH-based time complexity proof
FPT algorithms for various structural parameters
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-10-02arXiv.orgCitations: 0