MIRA: A Score for Conditional Distribution Accuracy and Model Comparison

📅 2026-05-03
📈 Citations: 0
✹ Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

206K/year
đŸ€– AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of accurately evaluating and comparing candidate conditional distributions using only joint samples drawn from the true data-generating process. The authors propose the MIRA score, a novel evaluation metric grounded in the principle that the true and candidate conditional distributions should assign identical probability mass across all regions of the support. By constructing an analytic statistic that directly quantifies consistency between a candidate conditional distribution and the true generative mechanism, MIRA enables unbiased validation without requiring marginal likelihood computation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first method to achieve such validation solely from joint samples, while also providing a theoretical reference value and uncertainty estimates. Empirical results on synthetic benchmarks and Bayesian inference tasks demonstrate that MIRA facilitates accurate assessment and reliable model comparison for conditional distributions.
📝 Abstract
We introduce Mira, a sample-based score for assessing the accuracy of a candidate conditional distribution using only joint samples from the true data-generating process. Relying on the principle that distributions coincide if they assign equal probability mass to all regions, we derive an analytic expression for the Mira statistic, whose average defines the Mira score. This formulation further allows us to compute theoretical reference values and uncertainty estimates when the candidate distribution matches the true one. This framework enables model comparison by quantifying the alignment between the conditional distribution of a candidate model and the true data generating process. Consequently, Mira enables Bayesian model comparison through direct posterior validation, bypassing the challenging evidence computation. We demonstrate its effectiveness across several toy problems and Bayesian inference tasks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

conditional distribution
model comparison
distribution accuracy
Bayesian inference
posterior validation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

conditional distribution
model comparison
posterior validation
score function
Bayesian inference
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Sammy Sharief
Mila – QuĂ©bec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Ciela Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; UniversitĂ© de MontrĂ©al, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; UniversitĂ© Paris-Saclay, UniversitĂ© Paris CitĂ©, CEA, CNRS, AIM, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
J
Justine Zeghal
Mila – QuĂ©bec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Ciela Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; UniversitĂ© de MontrĂ©al, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
G
Gabriel Missael Barco
Mila – QuĂ©bec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Ciela Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; UniversitĂ© de MontrĂ©al, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pablo Lemos
Pablo Lemos
Mila - Université de Montreal
CosmologyMachine LearningBayesian InferenceGenerative models
Yashar Hezaveh
Yashar Hezaveh
Stanford University
Laurence Perreault-Levasseur
Laurence Perreault-Levasseur
Associate Professor, Université de Montréal
CosmologyData ScienceMachine Learning