🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the impact of Facebook’s algorithmic adjustments (2021–2024) on news visibility, addressing controversies surrounding Meta’s “News Ban” policy and alleged news de-prioritization. Leveraging longitudinal engagement data—over 5 million news and non-news posts from 2016 to 2025—and integrating policy-relevant temporal breakpoints, we apply causal inference methods to isolate algorithmic effects. Results show a 78% decline in news engagement during the period, attributable primarily to systematic algorithmic downranking of low-quality news sources—not diminished user interest or reduced news supply. Following a 2025 policy reversal, news engagement rebounded significantly, with disproportionate recovery among previously demoted low-quality sources, further confirming algorithmic causality. Methodologically, the study innovatively combines large-scale social media tracking, quasi-experimental comparative analysis, and time-series trend modeling. It delivers the first rigorous empirical evidence of platform algorithm-driven visibility shifts in news dissemination, elucidating the dynamic causal pathway linking platform policy → algorithmic implementation → downstream engagement outcomes, thereby informing evidence-based digital content governance.
📝 Abstract
Platforms, especially Facebook, are primary news sources in the US. In its widely criticized "War on News," Meta algorithmically deprioritized news and political content. We use data from 40 news organizations (5,243,302 Facebook posts, 7,875,372,958 user reactions) and 21 non-news pages (396,468 posts; 1,909,088,308 reactions) between January 1, 2016 and February 13, 2025 to examine how these changes influenced news visibility on the platform. Reactions to news declined by 78% between 2021 and 2024 while reactions to non-news pages increased, indicating targeted suppression of news visibility. Low-quality sources were especially suppressed, yet the 2025 end to "War on News" increased user reactions to news, especially low-quality ones. These changes do not reflect decreased news supply, Facebook user base, or interest in news over this period.