An Empirical Study of GenAI Adoption in Open-Source Game Development: Tools, Tasks, and Developer Challenges

📅 2025-07-23
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Empirical studies on generative AI (GenAI) adoption in open-source game development—particularly regarding developer discourse, adoption patterns, and integration practices—remain scarce, leaving critical gaps in understanding real-world human-AI collaboration. Method: This study conducts the first systematic empirical investigation of GenAI usage in GitHub-hosted open-source game projects. We construct a curated dataset of AI-related repositories and apply hierarchical sampling, open card sorting, and thematic analysis to code and annotate issue discussions. Contribution/Results: Findings reveal that GenAI is predominantly applied to content generation and design ideation, yet developers face significant challenges in tool integration and express concerns about code quality and reliability. GenAI-associated tasks exhibit distinct distributions in task types, tool selection, and challenge profiles compared to traditional AI or non-AI tasks. This work bridges a key empirical gap in understanding GenAI-augmented software development in authentic settings, providing actionable insights for GenAI tool design, workflow integration, and community support mechanisms.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The growing capabilities of generative AI (GenAI) have begun to reshape how games are designed and developed, offering new tools for content creation, gameplay simulation, and design ideation. While prior research has explored traditional uses of AI in games, such as controlling agents or generating procedural content. There is limited empirical understanding of how GenAI is adopted by developers in real-world contexts, especially within the open-source community. This study aims to explore how GenAI technologies are discussed, adopted, and integrated into open-source game development by analyzing issue discussions on GitHub. We investigate the tools, tasks, and challenges associated with GenAI by comparing GenAI-related issues to those involving traditional AI (TradAI) and NonAI topics. Our goal is to uncover how GenAI differs from other approaches in terms of usage patterns, developer concerns, and integration practices. To address this objective, we construct a dataset of open-source game repositories that discuss AI-related topics. We apply open card sorting and thematic analysis to a stratified sample of GitHub issues, labelling each by type and content. These annotations enable comparative analysis across GenAI, TradAI, and NonAI groups, and provide insight into how GenAI is shaping the workflows and pain points of open-source game developers.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Study GenAI adoption in open-source game development
Compare GenAI, TradAI, and NonAI tools and challenges
Analyze GitHub issues to understand developer workflows
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Analyzing GitHub issues for GenAI adoption
Comparing GenAI, TradAI, and NonAI usage patterns
Applying thematic analysis to developer challenges
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
X
Xiang Echo Chen
David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
W
Wenhan Zhu
Waterloo, Canada
G
Guoshuai Albert Shi
David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
Michael W. Godfrey
Michael W. Godfrey
Professor of Computer Science, University of Waterloo
Software engineeringsoftware evolutionmining software repositoriessoftware analyticsempirical software engineering