Auditing of Unlearning Algorithms

📅 2026-07-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing machine unlearning algorithms lack effective means to rigorously verify whether the influence of training data has been genuinely removed. This work proposes a general auditing framework based on membership inference attacks, which leverages hypothesis testing to compute a lower bound (ε) on data-dependent unlearning parameters, thereby establishing, for the first time, empirical falsifiability of unlearning claims. The framework systematically evaluates diverse unlearning techniques—including model pruning, fine-tuning on retention sets, and rollback-based deletion—on CIFAR-100 and Shakespeare datasets. Experimental results reveal that theoretically grounded methods, such as model pruning, achieve markedly small ε bounds, whereas empirical approaches yield substantially larger ε values, highlighting a significant disparity in their practical unlearning efficacy.
📝 Abstract
Evaluating whether unlearning algorithms truly remove training data influence remains an open challenge. We propose a practical auditor that computes data-dependent lower bounds on the unlearning parameter $\varepsilon$ using membership inference attacks. Evaluating multiple unlearning algorithms, we find a sharp separation: algorithms with rigorous guarantees, such as model clipping and rewind-to-delete, achieve very small $\varepsilon$ bounds that do not falsify their unlearning guarantees, whereas empirical methods such as Hessian-based unlearning, interleaved ascent-descent, ascent on the forget set, and fine-tuning on the retain set exhibit large bounds, indicating poor unlearning. Our auditor provides a practical tool for empirically falsifying unlearning claims through a hypothesis-testing framework, and we validate it on CIFAR-100 and Shakespeare text.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

unlearning algorithms
membership inference attacks
data influence removal
empirical evaluation
privacy auditing
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

unlearning algorithms
membership inference attacks
auditing
epsilon bounds
hypothesis testing
🔎 Similar Papers