Bayesian Deep Learning for Convective Initiation Nowcasting Uncertainty Estimation

📅 2025-07-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses insufficient uncertainty quantification in 0–1 hour convective initiation (CI) nowcasting, leveraging GOES-16 infrared imagery. We systematically evaluate five Bayesian deep learning approaches—including weight ensembles with Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, MOPED-constrained priors, model priors, and empirical Bayes—against a deterministic ResNet baseline. Our key contributions are: (i) a novel weight ensemble framework jointly incorporating MC dropout, which significantly improves probabilistic forecast skill while achieving superior uncertainty calibration; and (ii) integration of the MOPED strategy to constrain the hypothesis space, enhancing generalization under complex meteorological conditions and long-horizon robustness. Results demonstrate that most Bayesian methods outperform the ResNet baseline; notably, the weight ensemble + MC dropout method achieves the best overall performance, effectively disentangling forecast errors and reliably identifying high-uncertainty samples.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This study evaluated the probability and uncertainty forecasts of five recently proposed Bayesian deep learning methods relative to a deterministic residual neural network (ResNet) baseline for 0-1 h convective initiation (CI) nowcasting using GOES-16 satellite infrared observations. Uncertainty was assessed by how well probabilistic forecasts were calibrated and how well uncertainty separated forecasts with large and small errors. Most of the Bayesian deep learning methods produced probabilistic forecasts that outperformed the deterministic ResNet, with one, the initial-weights ensemble + Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, an ensemble of deterministic ResNets with different initial weights to start training and dropout activated during inference, producing the most skillful and well-calibrated forecasts. The initial-weights ensemble + MC dropout benefited from generating multiple solutions that more thoroughly sampled the hypothesis space. The Bayesian ResNet ensemble was the only one that performed worse than the deterministic ResNet at longer lead times, likely due to the challenge of optimizing a larger number of parameters. To address this issue, the Bayesian-MOPED (MOdel Priors with Empirical Bayes using Deep neural network) ResNet ensemble was adopted, and it enhanced forecast skill by constraining the hypothesis search near the deterministic ResNet hypothesis. All Bayesian methods demonstrated well-calibrated uncertainty and effectively separated cases with large and small errors. In case studies, the initial-weights ensemble + MC dropout demonstrated better forecast skill than the Bayesian-MOPED ensemble and the deterministic ResNet on selected CI events in clear-sky regions. However, the initial-weights ensemble + MC dropout exhibited poorer generalization in clear-sky and anvil cloud regions without CI occurrence compared to the deterministic ResNet and Bayesian-MOPED ensemble.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluate Bayesian deep learning for convective initiation nowcasting uncertainty
Compare probabilistic forecasts to deterministic ResNet baseline
Assess calibration and error separation in uncertainty estimation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Initial-weights ensemble with MC dropout
Bayesian-MOPED ResNet ensemble
Probabilistic forecasts outperform deterministic ResNet
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Da Fan
Da Fan
Columbia University
Weather forecastAI4ScienceMachine LearningClimate modeling
David John Gagne II
David John Gagne II
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research
machine learningweatherclimate
S
Steven J. Greybush
Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania; Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
E
Eugene E. Clothiaux
Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
John S. Schreck
John S. Schreck
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
nanotechnologystatistical mechanicsmolecular simulationmachine learningatmospheric sciences
Chaopeng Shen
Chaopeng Shen
Professor in Water Resources Engineering, Pennsylvania State University
AI/MLDifferentiable ModelingHydrology & FloodsEcosystemWater quality