UWB Radar-based Heart Rate Monitoring: A Transfer Learning Approach

๐Ÿ“… 2025-07-14
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
Heterogeneous millimeter-wave radar systemsโ€”such as Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) and Impulse Radio Ultra-Wideband (IR-UWB)โ€”lack standardization for contactless heart rate monitoring, necessitating extensive paired data collection for each radar modality. Method: We propose the first cross-radar-modality transfer learning framework, based on a 2D+1D ResNet architecture: a high-resolution FMCW radar dataset is used for pretraining, followed by lightweight fine-tuning using only single-antenna, single-range-gate, low-resolution IR-UWB data. Contribution/Results: This work achieves the first successful knowledge transfer from FMCW to IR-UWB for heart rate estimation. Experimental results show that the transferred IR-UWB model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.1 bpm (25% improvement over baseline), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 6.3%, and recall of 97.5%; the source FMCW model attains MAE = 0.85 bpm and MAPE = 1.42%. The framework significantly enhances model generalizability while reducing data dependency and calibration costs for new radar deployments.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Radar technology presents untapped potential for continuous, contactless, and passive heart rate monitoring via consumer electronics like mobile phones. However the variety of available radar systems and lack of standardization means that a large new paired dataset collection is required for each radar system. This study demonstrates transfer learning between frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) and impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar systems, both increasingly integrated into consumer devices. FMCW radar utilizes a continuous chirp, while IR-UWB radar employs short pulses. Our mm-wave FMCW radar operated at 60 GHz with a 5.5 GHz bandwidth (2.7 cm resolution, 3 receiving antennas [Rx]), and our IR-UWB radar at 8 GHz with a 500 MHz bandwidth (30 cm resolution, 2 Rx). Using a novel 2D+1D ResNet architecture we achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.85 bpm and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 1.42% for heart rate monitoring with FMCW radar (N=119 participants, an average of 8 hours per participant). This model maintained performance (under 5 MAE/10% MAPE) across various body positions and heart rate ranges, with a 98.9% recall. We then fine-tuned a variant of this model, trained on single-antenna and single-range bin FMCW data, using a small (N=376, avg 6 minutes per participant) IR-UWB dataset. This transfer learning approach yielded a model with MAE 4.1 bpm and MAPE 6.3% (97.5% recall), a 25% MAE reduction over the IR-UWB baseline. This demonstration of transfer learning between radar systems for heart rate monitoring has the potential to accelerate its introduction into existing consumer devices.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Transfer learning between FMCW and IR-UWB radar systems for heart rate monitoring
Reducing need for large new datasets per radar system via transfer learning
Achieving accurate contactless heart rate monitoring across different radar types
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Transfer learning between FMCW and IR-UWB radar systems
2D+1D ResNet architecture for heart rate monitoring
Fine-tuning model with small IR-UWB dataset
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
E
Elzbieta Gruzewska
Google
P
Pooja Rao
Google
S
Sebastien Baur
Google
Matthew Baugh
Matthew Baugh
Imperial College London
machine learninganomaly detectionmedical imagingoutlier detection
M
Mathias M. J. Bellaiche
Google
Sharanya Srinivas
Sharanya Srinivas
Algorithm Engineer, Google
Hybrid RF SystemsRF ConvergenceSpectrum SharingAdaptive Filtering
O
Octavio Ponce
Google
Matthew Thompson
Matthew Thompson
University of Washington
AIdiagnosticsinfectionscancerdigital health
P
Pramod Rudrapatna
Google
M
Michael A. Sanchez
Google
L
Lawrence Z. Cai
Google
T
Timothy JA Chico
NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
R
Robert F. Storey
NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
E
Emily Maz
NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
U
Umesh Telang
Google
Shravya Shetty
Shravya Shetty
Google Research
Mayank Daswani
Mayank Daswani
Microsoft
Mobile sensingAI for healthcareLarge language models