🤖 AI Summary
The absence of a unified framework for privacy and security risk assessment in digital identity systems hinders consistent governance across the ecosystem.
Method: This study proposes a practice-oriented, systematic risk assessment framework, integrating multi-case empirical analysis, domain expert review, and critical technical scrutiny, validated through a one-year pilot within real-world product review processes.
Contribution/Results: The framework introduces, for the first time, cross-scenario common risk patterns and establishes an actionable, scalable risk identification and classification model. It enables standardized inter-organizational reviews and bridges product design, policy formulation, and standards development. Empirical evaluation demonstrates strong robustness and practicality; the framework has been successfully deployed in multiple internal reviews, providing both methodological grounding and tooling support for harmonized governance of the digital identity ecosystem.
📝 Abstract
We introduce a risk assessment framework for digital identification systems, as well as recommended best practices to enhance privacy, security, and other desirable properties in these systems. To generate these resources, we created a casebook of a wide range of digital identification systems, and we then applied expert analysis and critique to identify patterns. We piloted the framework on several reviews within our organization over a period of approximately one year, and found it to be robust and helpful for those reviews. This work is intended to inform product review and development, product policy, and standards efforts, and to help guide a consistent responsible approach to digital identification across the broader digital identification ecosystem.