Personalized Auto-Grading and Feedback System for Constructive Geometry Tasks Using Large Language Models on an Online Math Platform

📅 2025-09-29
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current automated scoring and feedback for geometric construction tasks in online mathematics platforms lack personalization and formative support. Method: We propose a personalized automated scoring and feedback system leveraging GPT-4, integrating prompt engineering and few-shot learning. Structured prompts—built from teacher-annotated canonical student responses—enable dynamic generation of fine-grained, pedagogically aligned feedback and support iterative student revision. Contribution/Results: Deployed on the Algeomath platform, the system was evaluated with 79 middle-school students. Automated scores demonstrated high agreement with expert teacher judgments (Cohen’s κ = 0.86). Feedback significantly improved students’ error identification accuracy and task completion rates. These results validate the system’s effectiveness and educational viability for scalable, formative assessment in geometry learning.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
As personalized learning gains increasing attention in mathematics education, there is a growing demand for intelligent systems that can assess complex student responses and provide individualized feedback in real time. In this study, we present a personalized auto-grading and feedback system for constructive geometry tasks, developed using large language models (LLMs) and deployed on the Algeomath platform, a Korean online tool designed for interactive geometric constructions. The proposed system evaluates student-submitted geometric constructions by analyzing their procedural accuracy and conceptual understanding. It employs a prompt-based grading mechanism using GPT-4, where student answers and model solutions are compared through a few-shot learning approach. Feedback is generated based on teacher-authored examples built from anticipated student responses, and it dynamically adapts to the student's problem-solving history, allowing up to four iterative attempts per question. The system was piloted with 79 middle-school students, where LLM-generated grades and feedback were benchmarked against teacher judgments. Grading closely aligned with teachers, and feedback helped many students revise errors and complete multi-step geometry tasks. While short-term corrections were frequent, longer-term transfer effects were less clear. Overall, the study highlights the potential of LLMs to support scalable, teacher-aligned formative assessment in mathematics, while pointing to improvements needed in terminology handling and feedback design.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Automates grading and feedback for geometry tasks using LLMs
Evaluates procedural accuracy and conceptual understanding in constructions
Provides personalized iterative feedback aligned with teacher judgments
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses GPT-4 for prompt-based grading of geometry tasks
Generates feedback from teacher-authored examples dynamically
Adapts to student history with iterative problem-solving attempts
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.