🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the trade-off between prediction error in elective surgery length-of-stay (LOS) forecasts and patient rescheduling strategies to mitigate bed overflow and improve resource utilization. Method: We propose a simulation-based framework that integrates machine learning–based LOS prediction models with dynamic rescheduling policies—including delayed admissions and inter-ward transfers—to quantify the substitution effect between prediction accuracy and operational flexibility under multiple scenarios. Contribution/Results: Our key insight is that high prediction accuracy is not strictly necessary: moderately accurate forecasts, when coupled with flexible rescheduling, significantly reduce bed overflow rates, enhance bed turnover efficiency, and diminish reliance on computationally expensive, high-precision predictive models. The findings establish a new paradigm for hospital operations—one that balances robustness and cost-effectiveness in surgical scheduling optimization.
📝 Abstract
The availability of downstream resources plays a critical role in planning the admission of patients undergoing elective surgery, with inpatient beds being one of the most crucial resources. When planning patient admissions, predictions on their length-of-stay (LOS) made by machine learning (ML) models are used to ensure bed availability. However, the actual LOS for each patient may differ considerably from the predicted value, potentially making the schedule infeasible. To address such infeasibilities, rescheduling strategies that take advantage of operational flexibility can be implemented. For example, adjustments may include postponing admission dates, relocating patients to different wards, or even transferring patients who are already admitted. The common assumption is that more accurate LOS predictions reduce the impact of rescheduling. However, training ML models that can make such accurate predictions can be costly. Building on previous work that proposed simulated ac{ml} for evaluating data-driven approaches, this paper explores the relationship between LOS prediction accuracy and rescheduling flexibility across various corrective policies. Specifically, we examine the most effective patient rescheduling strategies under LOS prediction errors to prevent bed overflows while optimizing resource utilization.