Online Convex Optimization with Sublinear Noisy Probes

📅 2026-06-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates how to leverage a sublinear number of noisy pairwise probes—comparisons indicating which of two points incurs lower loss—to improve worst-case regret in online convex optimization (OCO). The authors introduce a unified probing model and establish, for the first time, that even with only \(k = o(T)\) such noisy comparisons, the regret bound of full-feedback OCO can be significantly enhanced. By integrating a continuous exponential weights algorithm with variance-reduction analysis, they characterize the second-order effect of probing and derive an almost-tight regret upper bound of \(O\big(\min\{\sqrt{dT \ln T},\, dT \ln T / (k|1 - 2\delta|)\}\big)\), where \(\delta\) denotes the noise level. This bound is theoretically optimal in the horizon \(T\), number of probes \(k\), noise parameter \(\delta\), and number of experts \(d\) (in the finite action setting).
📝 Abstract
We study Online Convex Optimization (OCO) over a convex set $K\subseteq \mathbb R^d$, where in each round $t$ the learner selects $x_t\in K$ and then observes a convex loss $f_t:K\to[0,1]$, with the goal of minimizing regret to the best fixed decision in hindsight. We introduce a unified probing model that generalizes two recent lines of work: sublinear best-expert queries in the experts setting, and pairwise (comparison-based) feedback available every round in OCO. In our framework, the learner has a budget of $k\le T$ pairwise probes; on a probed round it may query two points and learn which one has smaller loss. Our main result shows that even a sublinear and noisy probe budget can provably improve worst-case regret in the full feedback OCO regime. With $k$ $δ$-noisy pairwise probes, we obtain: $ \text{Reg}_T \le O\left(\min\left\{\sqrt{dT\ln T},\; \frac{dT\ln T}{k|1-2δ|}\right\}\right) $, which is tight (up to logarithmic factors in $T$) across $T$, $k$ and $δ$. Specifically regarding the noise parameter $δ\in [0,1]$, the regret guarantee smoothly degrades as the oracle response approaches a coin flip, i.e., $δ$ is close to $\frac{1}{2}$. When applying the same techniques to a finite $K$ for the prediction with $d$ experts setting, the resulting rates are instead completely tight in all parameters, including $d$. Our analysis gives a streamlined treatment of pairwise probing in OCO by quantifying the benefit of probing via a variance reduction effect, combined with a second-order (variance-based) analysis of Continuous Exponential Weights.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Online Convex Optimization
Noisy Probes
Pairwise Feedback
Regret Minimization
Sublinear Queries
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Online Convex Optimization
Pairwise Probing
Sublinear Queries
Noisy Comparisons
Regret Minimization
🔎 Similar Papers