Poker Arena: Multi-Axis Profiling of Strategic Reasoning and Memory in LLMs

📅 2026-06-11
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current game-playing evaluations rely on single scalar metrics, which inadequately capture the multidimensional strategic reasoning capabilities of large language models in uncertain environments. This work introduces a benchmark platform based on no-limit Texas Hold’em and proposes a three-tier memory architecture—comprising within-hand, within-session, and cross-session memory—together with a nine-dimensional decomposition framework for strategic reasoning. Through large-scale adversarial simulations and memory ablation studies, the evaluation reveals fine-grained performance characteristics. Analysis of 50,000 hands demonstrates a significant discrepancy between chip-based rankings and multidimensional capability scores, indicating that cross-dimensional consistency is a more reliable indicator of true strategic proficiency than peak performance along any single axis, thereby challenging the validity of conventional leaderboard paradigms.
📝 Abstract
Strategic reasoning under uncertainty underpins consequential decisions in negotiation, finance, and policy, but prevailing game-play benchmarks collapse heterogeneous reasoning dimensions into a single scalar, leaving the capability structure of frontier LLMs unexamined. We introduce Poker Arena, a no-limit Texas Hold'em tournament platform that couples a three-layer memory architecture (within-hand, session, and cross-session) with a nine-axis cognitive profile decomposing strategic reasoning into interpretable dimensions such as bet-sizing calibration and positional awareness. We evaluate seven frontier models across 50 sessions of 1,000 hands and a controlled memory ablation; tournament chips and aggregate axis score order the field differently: Claude Opus 4.6 wins +$15,730 chips with 14 first-place finishes, yet ranks only fifth of seven on mean axis score, while persistent memory helps some models and hurts others. These findings show that multi-axis evaluation surfaces capability structure that scalar leaderboards systematically misrank, with cross-dimensional consistency outweighing peak performance on any single axis.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

strategic reasoning
multi-axis evaluation
LLMs
game-play benchmarks
capability structure
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

multi-axis evaluation
strategic reasoning
memory architecture
large language models
game-based benchmarking
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.