🤖 AI Summary
Conventional methods for estimating inter-condition network differences in high-dimensional multivariate time series—such as pre- and post-seizure EEG—estimate individual spectral networks separately and subtract them, thereby amplifying estimation error. Performance degrades significantly when the underlying networks are non-sparse but their difference is sparse. Method: We propose a novel frequency-domain approach that directly estimates the difference of inverse spectral density matrices. Our method integrates spectral density modeling, inverse covariance estimation, and frequency-domain statistical inference. Contribution/Results: We introduce the first theoretical framework formalizing “difference sparsity,” imposing L1 regularization solely on the differential structure—bypassing restrictive sparsity assumptions on the original high-dimensional networks. Evaluated on synthetic data and real EEG/micro-ECoG recordings, our method achieves superior consistency, stability, and detection accuracy in differential network estimation, providing an interpretable and robust tool for dynamic brain connectivity analysis.
📝 Abstract
Spectral networks derived from multivariate time series data arise in many domains, from brain science to Earth science. Often, it is of interest to study how these networks change under different conditions. For instance, to better understand epilepsy, it would be interesting to capture the changes in the brain connectivity network as a patient experiences a seizure, using electroencephalography data. A common approach relies on estimating the networks in each condition and calculating their difference. Such estimates may behave poorly in high dimensions as the networks themselves may not be sparse in structure while their difference may be. We build upon this observation to develop an estimator of the difference in inverse spectral densities across two conditions. Using an L1 penalty on the difference, consistency is established by only requiring the difference to be sparse. We illustrate the method on synthetic data experiments, on experiments with electroencephalography data, and on experiments with optogentic stimulation and micro-electrocorticography data.