🤖 AI Summary
Traditional single-step next-token prediction struggles to capture the global structure inherent in planning-oriented reasoning tasks. This work proposes a multi-token prediction mechanism and demonstrates—through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation—that it induces a two-stage backward reasoning process with gradient decoupling properties, yielding clearer training signals that facilitate the learning of interpretable reasoning circuits. Using a simplified two-layer Transformer architecture, the approach is evaluated on synthetic and real-world reasoning benchmarks, including graph pathfinding, the Countdown game, and Boolean satisfiability. Results show that multi-token prediction consistently and significantly outperforms conventional next-token prediction, effectively enhancing the model’s planning capabilities.
📝 Abstract
While next-token prediction (NTP) has been the standard objective for training language models, it often struggles to capture global structure in reasoning tasks. Multi-token prediction (MTP) has recently emerged as a promising alternative, yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this paper, we study how MTP facilitates reasoning, with a focus on planning. Empirically, we show that MTP consistently outperforms NTP on both synthetic graph path-finding tasks and more realistic reasoning benchmarks, such as Countdown and boolean satisfiability problems. Theoretically, we analyze a simplified two-layer Transformer on a star graph task. We prove that MTP induces a two-stage reverse reasoning process: the model first attends to the end node and then reconstructs the path by tracing intermediate nodes backward. This behavior arises from a gradient decoupling property of MTP, which provides a cleaner training signal compared to NTP. Ultimately, our results highlight how multi-token objectives inherently bias optimization toward robust and interpretable reasoning circuits.