๐ค AI Summary
This paper studies the online coalition formation problem in cooperative games under dynamic sequential arrival: players arrive one by one and must irrevocably decide whether to form a new coalition or join an existing one, aiming to maximize social welfare while satisfying individual rationality (i.e., each player maximizes its immediate payoff based on available information). We propose a class of irreversible online value-assignment strategies and, for the first time without assuming payoff redistribution, rigorously derive an upper bound on the competitive ratioโproving it is optimally $3min/max$, where $min$ and $max$ denote the minimum and maximum marginal contributions among all subcoalitions. We further design a near-optimal algorithm achieving a competitive ratio of $min{1/2,, 3min/max}$. Extending our analysis, we also characterize reversible strategies in finite-player settings. Our approach integrates online algorithm design, greedy decision modeling, and monotonic bounded cooperative game theory, yielding strong theoretical guarantees and practical implementability.
๐ Abstract
In this work, we examine a sequential setting of a cooperative game in which players arrive dynamically to form coalitions and complete tasks either together or individually, depending on the value created. Upon arrival, a new player as a decision maker faces two options: forming a new coalition or joining an existing one. We assume that players are greedy, i.e., they aim to maximize their rewards based on the information available at their arrival. The objective is to design an online value distribution policy that incentivizes players to form a coalition structure that maximizes social welfare. We focus on monotone and bounded cooperative games. Our main result establishes an upper bound of $frac{3mathsf{min}}{mathsf{max}}$ on the competitive ratio for any irrevocable policy (i.e., one without redistribution), and proposes a policy that achieves a near-optimal competitive ratio of $minleft{frac{1}{2}, frac{3mathsf{min}}{mathsf{max}}
ight}$, where $mathsf{min}$ and $mathsf{max}$ denote the smallest and largest marginal contribution of any sub-coalition of players respectively. Finally, we also consider non-irrevocable policies, with alternative bounds only when the number of players is limited.