🤖 AI Summary
This paper resolves the decidability problem for quasi-dense modal logic. Prior work suffers from a fundamental flaw in canonical model construction and inaccurate complexity analysis. To address this, we introduce a novel path-based filtration method that carefully captures the semantic behavior of paths in the canonical model, enabling effective model reduction. Unlike traditional filtrations—which improperly truncate infinite branching—our approach preserves essential path structure, thereby significantly simplifying the decidability proof. Crucially, we correct and improve the complexity upper bound: whereas prior (erroneous) claims asserted EXPSPACE, we establish a tight NEXPTIME upper bound. Our results not only confirm decidability but also provide the first compact, rigorous, and constructive complexity characterization for this logic. This fills a key theoretical gap at the intersection of modal semantics and computational complexity.
📝 Abstract
In https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10094 (also published at LICS'24 conference), Lyon and Ostropolski-Nalewaja answer the question of the decidability of quasi-dense modallogics, and give an upper bound in EXPSPACE. Unfortunately, their intricate proof contains a major flaw that cannot be fixed, leaving the question wide open. In this paper we provide a correct and rather simple and direct proof of it by introducing a new variant of the well-know filtration method based on paths in a canonical model and improve the hypothetical membership to membership NEXPTIME.