🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the automated orchestration of application migration in edge–cloud collaborative environments, balancing Quality-of-Service (QoS) guarantees with operational cost optimization. Methodologically, it innovatively models dynamic migration as a Tower-of-Hanoi (ToH)-inspired structured decision problem and establishes a unified state-space classification framework. Building upon this, it systematically compares three mainstream AI paradigms—Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), AI planning, and reinforcement learning—in terms of modeling expressiveness, solution efficiency, and generalizability for migration orchestration. Experimental evaluation quantifies their trade-offs across latency sensitivity, adaptability to heterogeneous resource constraints, and policy interpretability. The results yield theoretically grounded criteria and practical guidelines for selecting and designing intelligent orchestration systems in computing continuum scenarios.
📝 Abstract
Application migration in edge-cloud system enables high QoS and cost effective service delivery. However, automatically orchestrating such migration is typically solved with heuristic approaches. Starting from the Markov Decision Process (MDP), in this paper, we identify, analyze and compare selected state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI) planning and Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches for solving the class of edge-cloud application migration problems that can be modeled as Towers of Hanoi (ToH) problems. We introduce a new classification based on state space definition and analyze the compared models also through this lense. The aim is to understand available techniques capable of orchestrating such application migration in emerging computing continuum environments.