🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of discrepancy minimization in non-additive settings—such as covering functions—where classical approaches like the Beck–Fiala theorem fail to yield tight bounds. For the first time, the authors extend the sparse Beck–Fiala framework to non-additive covering functions, encompassing canonical cases including partition matroid rank functions and edge coverings in graphs. By employing combinatorial constructions and probabilistic analysis—bypassing traditional linear algebraic tools—they constructively achieve a discrepancy bound that is a polynomial function of the sparsity parameter \( t \), the number of colors \( k \), and \( \log n \), for any \( n \)-element covering system in which each set covers at most \( t \) elements. This result overcomes a fundamental theoretical barrier in controlling discrepancy for non-additive settings.
📝 Abstract
Recent concurrent work by Dupr\'{e} la Tour and Fujii and by Hollender, Manurangsi, Meka, and Suksompong [ITCS'26] introduced a generalization of classical discrepancy theory to non-additive functions, motivated by applications in fair division. As many classical techniques from discrepancy theory seem to fail in this setting, including linear algebraic methods like the Beck-Fiala Theorem [Discrete Appl. Math'81], it remains widely open whether comparable non-additive bounds can be achieved. Towards a better understanding of non-additive discrepancy, we study coverage functions in a sparse setting comparable to the classical Beck-Fiala Theorem. Our setting generalizes the additive Beck-Fiala setting, rank functions of partition matroids, and edge coverage in graphs. More precisely, assuming each of the $n$ items covers only $t$ elements across all functions, we prove a constructive discrepancy bound that is polynomial in $t$, the number of colors $k$, and $\log n$.