Stable Matching with Predictions: Robustness and Efficiency under Pruned Preferences

📅 2026-02-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the inefficiency of traditional stable matching mechanisms in large two-sided markets—such as the medical residency match—where participants struggle to rank all potential partners, rendering full preference elicitation impractical. The authors propose a framework that leverages historical data to predict likely matches and constructs truncated preference lists centered only on these predictions. By integrating this prediction-driven preference pruning with the Deferred Acceptance (DA) algorithm, the approach maintains stability while substantially reducing both the length of preference lists and the number of proposals required. Theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation demonstrate that the method preserves matching stability under truncated preferences and achieves significant gains in computational efficiency. This work is the first to combine predictive modeling with DA in this manner, establishing the robustness and scalability of the approach in settings with incomplete preference information.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In this paper, we study the fundamental problem of finding a stable matching in two-sided matching markets. In the classic variant, it is assumed that both sides of the market submit a ranked list of all agents on the other side. However, in large matching markets such as the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), it is infeasible for hospitals to interview or mutually rank each resident. In this paper, we study the stable matching problem with truncated preference lists. In particular, we assume that, based on historical datasets, each hospital has a predicted rank of its likely match and only ranks residents within a bounded interval around that prediction. We use the algorithms-with-predictions framework and show that the classic deferred-acceptance (DA) algorithm used to compute stable matchings is robust to such truncation. We present two algorithms and theoretically and empirically evaluate their performance. Our results show that even with reasonably accurate predictions, it is possible to significantly cut down on both instance size (the length of preference lists) as well as the number of proposals made. These results explain the practical success of the DA algorithm and connect market design to the emerging theory of algorithms with predictions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

stable matching
truncated preferences
matching markets
preference prediction
deferred acceptance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

stable matching
algorithms with predictions
deferred acceptance
truncated preferences
market design
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.