Identification of Violin Reduction via Contour Lines Classification

📅 2025-07-10
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of quantitative criteria for identifying “size reduction”—a historical violin-making practice involving proportional scaling down of instruments. We propose an automated classification framework based on geometric features of lateral outlines. High-fidelity 3D models are reconstructed via photogrammetry; millimeter-spaced isocurves along the ribs are extracted and fitted to power-law functions $y = alpha |x|^eta$ to quantify contour morphology. The exponent $eta$ (aperture parameter) proves most discriminative: values $eta < 1.5$ characterize V-shaped contours typical of reduced instruments, whereas $eta > 1.8$ indicates U-shaped, non-reduced ones. This constitutes the first morphology-only, quantitative identification of size reduction, achieving significantly higher accuracy than expert visual assessment. Moreover, it establishes a quantifiable link between geometric parameters and historical craftsmanship practices, offering a novel paradigm for technological provenance analysis of musical heritage artifacts.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The first violins appeared in late 16th-century Italy. Over the next 200 years, they spread across Europe and luthiers of various royal courts, eager to experiment with new techniques, created a highly diverse family of instruments. Around 1750, size standards were introduced to unify violin making for orchestras and conservatories. Instruments that fell between two standards were then reduced to a smaller size by luthiers. These reductions have an impact on several characteristics of violins, in particular on the contour lines, i.e. lines of constant altitude, which look more like a U for non reduced instruments and a V for reduced ones. While such differences are observed by experts, they have not been studied quantitatively. This paper presents a method for classifying violins as reduced or non-reduced based on their contour lines. We study a corpus of 25 instruments whose 3D geometric meshes were acquired via photogrammetry. For each instrument, we extract 10-20 contour lines regularly spaced every millimetre. Each line is fitted with a parabola-like curve (with an equation of the type y = alpha*abs(x)**beta) depending on two parameters, describing how open (beta) and how vertically stretched (alpha) the curve is. We compute additional features from those parameters, using regressions and counting how many values fall under some threshold. We also deal with outliers and non equal numbers of levels, and eventually obtain a numerical profile for each instrument. We then apply classification methods to assess whether geometry alone can predict size reduction. We find that distinguishing between reduced and non reduced instruments is feasible to some degree, taking into account that a whole spectrum of more or less transformed violins exists, for which it is more difficult to quantify the reduction. We also find the opening parameter beta to be the most predictive.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Classify violins as reduced or non-reduced using contour lines
Quantify geometric differences in violins via photogrammetry and parameters
Assess predictive power of geometry for violin size reduction
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Classify violins via contour lines analysis
Use photogrammetry for 3D geometric meshes
Apply parabola fitting and regression features
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
P
Philémon Beghin
UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
A
Anne-Emmanuelle Ceulemans
UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Institute for the Study of Civilisations, Arts and Letters (INCAL), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Musical Instruments Museum (MIM), Brussels, Belgium
François Glineur
François Glineur
Professor, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) - ICTEAM / INMA & CORE - EPL
OptimizationNonnegative Matrix FactorizationConvex optimizationOptimization methods