π€ AI Summary
This paper formalizes Herbert Simonβs bounded rationality and satisficing decision theory to bridge the mathematical gap between behavioral economics and classical expected utility theory. To this end, we propose the Flexible First-Order Stochastic Dominance (FFSD) framework and achieve the first machine-checked verification of bounded rationality in the Lean 4 theorem prover. Our approach introduces a parameterized tolerance threshold Ξ΅ < 1/2 to ensure reference-point uniqueness, proves that FFSD is equivalent to expected utility maximization under an approximate indicator function, and generalizes the result to multidimensional decision settings. This work establishes the first verifiable formal foundation for bounded rationality, enabling mechanized reasoning about uncertain decisions under cognitive constraints. It provides a novel, rigorous paradigm for the formal analysis of behavioral economic models.
π Abstract
This paper introduces Flexible First-Order Stochastic Dominance (FFSD), a mathematically rigorous framework that formalizes Herbert Simon's concept of bounded rationality using the Lean 4 theorem prover. We develop machine-verified proofs demonstrating that FFSD bridges classical expected utility theory with Simon's satisficing behavior through parameterized tolerance thresholds. Our approach yields several key results: (1) a critical threshold $varepsilon < 1/2$ that guarantees uniqueness of reference points, (2) an equivalence theorem linking FFSD to expected utility maximization for approximate indicator functions, and (3) extensions to multi-dimensional decision settings. By encoding these concepts in Lean 4's dependent type theory, we provide the first machine-checked formalization of Simon's bounded rationality, creating a foundation for mechanized reasoning about economic decision-making under uncertainty with cognitive limitations. This work contributes to the growing intersection between formal mathematics and economic theory, demonstrating how interactive theorem proving can advance our understanding of behavioral economics concepts that have traditionally been expressed only qualitatively.