🤖 AI Summary
Financially distressed firms possess strong incentives to manipulate financial statements—concealing operational deterioration, inflating profits, and evading fraud detection—yet existing adversarial attack methods fail to jointly optimize conflicting reverse-correlation objectives (e.g., increasing reported profit while decreasing fraud risk scores). This paper proposes Maximum Violation Multi-Objective (MVMO) attack, a novel adversarial framework that integrates accounting standards and legal constraints to define a realistic threat model, and employs dynamic multi-objective optimization to simultaneously perturb financial metrics and fraud risk scores. Experiments demonstrate that MVMO successfully inflates reported earnings by 100–200% while reducing fraud scores by 15% in ~50% of cases, achieving a 20× higher success rate than conventional methods. To our knowledge, this is the first work to formalize financial statement manipulation as an adversarial machine learning problem, offering novel insights for audit defense mechanisms and regulatory technology (RegTech).
📝 Abstract
Bad actors, primarily distressed firms, have the incentive and desire to manipulate their financial reports to hide their distress and derive personal gains. As attackers, these firms are motivated by potentially millions of dollars and the availability of many publicly disclosed and used financial modeling frameworks. Existing attack methods do not work on this data due to anti-correlated objectives that must both be satisfied for the attacker to succeed. We introduce Maximum Violated Multi-Objective (MVMO) attacks that adapt the attacker's search direction to find $20 imes$ more satisfying attacks compared to standard attacks. The result is that in $approx50%$ of cases, a company could inflate their earnings by 100-200%, while simultaneously reducing their fraud scores by 15%. By working with lawyers and professional accountants, we ensure our threat model is realistic to how such frauds are performed in practice.