🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the influence of benchmark function design in the IEEE CEC single-objective optimization competitions (2010–2024) on the evolution of algorithmic performance and its implications for variational quantum optimization. Through historical data analysis, comparative algorithm evaluation, and assessment of rotational invariance—augmented by feature engineering to identify critical benchmark characteristics—the work establishes, for the first time, a systematic causal relationship between benchmark structure and algorithmic advancement. The findings reveal that rotationally invariant differential evolution variants such as L-SHADE dominated the competitions following the introduction of dense rotation matrices in 2014, while high-complexity hybrid optimizers emerging post-2020 significantly enhanced ranking stability. Furthermore, the study constructs a structural linkage between the capabilities of classical optimizers and the requirements of variational quantum algorithms.
📝 Abstract
This paper provides a historical analysis of the IEEE CEC Single Objective Optimization competition results (2010-2024). We analyze how benchmark functions shaped winning algorithms, identifying the 2014 introduction of dense rotation matrices as a key performance filter. This design choice introduced parameter non-separability, reduced effectiveness of coordinate-dependent methods (PSO, GA), and established the dominance of Differential Evolution variants capable of preserving the rotational invariance of their difference vectors, specifically L-SHADE. Post-2020 analysis reveals a shift towards high complexity hybrid optimizers that combine different mechanisms (e.g., Eigenvector Crossover, Societal Sharing, Reinforcement Learning) to maximize ranking stability. We conclude by identifying structural similarities between these modern benchmarks and Variational Quantum Algorithm landscapes, suggesting that evolved CEC solvers possess the specific adaptive capabilities required for quantum control.