🤖 AI Summary
This work proposes AD-Reasoning, a novel framework for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis that integrates structural MRI with six categories of clinical data to align with the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) guidelines. Addressing the lack of transparency and guideline adherence in existing models, AD-Reasoning employs modality-specific encoders and bidirectional cross-attention for multimodal fusion, coupled with a rule-driven verifier that generates structured diagnoses and interpretable reasoning paths compliant with clinical standards. The framework further introduces a verifiable reward mechanism to guide reinforcement fine-tuning, ensuring output format consistency, comprehensive evidence coverage, and alignment between reasoning and diagnostic decisions. A large-scale multimodal question-answering dataset, AD-MultiSense, is also released. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms current baselines in both diagnostic accuracy and reasoning transparency.
📝 Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis requires integrating neuroimaging with heterogeneous clinical evidence and reasoning under established criteria, yet most multimodal models remain opaque and weakly guideline-aligned. We present AD-Reasoning, a multimodal framework that couples structural MRI with six clinical modalities and a rule-based verifier to generate structured, NIA-AA-consistent diagnoses. AD-Reasoning combines modality-specific encoders, bidirectional cross-attention fusion, and reinforcement fine-tuning with verifiable rewards that enforce output format, guideline evidence coverage, and reasoning--decision consistency. We also release AD-MultiSense, a 10,378-visit multimodal QA dataset with guideline-validated rationales built from ADNI/AIBL. On AD-MultiSense, AD-Reasoning achieves state-of-the-art diagnostic accuracy and produces structured rationales that improve transparency over recent baselines, while providing transparent rationales.