LENS: In-Context Search via Latent Evidence Exploration over Dynamic Raw Documents

📅 2026-08-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenges of high indexing costs, rigid granularity, and update latency in dynamic document retrieval by proposing LENS, an index-free framework. LENS formulates evidence localization as a latent space exploration task under budget constraints, employing multi-strategy candidate generation and LLM-driven Bayesian belief updates to achieve query-adaptive evidence search with self-organizing cluster reuse. Experiments demonstrate that LENS attains 62.4% exact match accuracy and 84.8% evidence recall without preprocessing. On a Wikipedia subset, it achieves answer quality comparable to ReAct while improving evidence support rate to 84.0%, significantly outperforming existing baselines. These results confirm that LENS effectively balances dynamic adaptability with precise attribution, offering a robust solution for real-time retrieval-augmented generation in evolving corpora.
📝 Abstract
LLM agents increasingly answer questions over dynamic raw-document collections, where files may change before preprocessing, and relevant evidence (spans, sections, pages, or tables) is query-dependent. Existing retrieval-augmented approaches pre-materialize evidence via fixed chunking, embeddings, or persistent indexes: effective for lookup, yet costly, stale-prone, and committed to a granularity before the query is known. We formulate in-context search as Budgeted Evidence Localization over a latent evidence space induced by dynamic raw documents and propose LENS (Latent Evidence Exploration and Search), an index-free framework. Instead of pre-materializing the evidence space, LENS maintains a query-conditioned belief over candidate units, iteratively selecting candidates via complementary lexical, local, and exploratory proposal policies, updating the belief via an LLM relevance oracle, and narrowing toward high-posterior regions under a controllable budget. Evidence is consolidated into compact, source-grounded regions of interest and compressed into self-organizing knowledge clusters reused across related queries. On a controlled 500-question evaluation with matched corpus snapshots, LENS reaches 62.4% exact match and 84.8% evidence recall vs. 65.2% exact match but 50.4% evidence recall for a ReAct-style baseline. Across scales, LENS gives the strongest supporting-fact localization and answer grounding. On a fixed 150-question fullwiki subset over the raw Wikipedia dump with zero indexing, LENS and ReAct are nearly tied in official answer quality (43.3% vs. 42.7% EM), with LENS grounding more answers in retrieved evidence (84.0% vs. 70.7%). A no-retrieval Closed-Book reference highlights the contribution of model memory. LENS is query-ready after corpus changes, needs no preprocessing or persistent index, and preserves source-grounded evidence localization throughout.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Dynamic Raw Documents
In-Context Search
Evidence Localization
Index-free Retrieval
Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Index-free Framework
Latent Evidence Exploration
Budgeted Evidence Localization
Dynamic Raw Documents
Self-organizing Knowledge Clusters
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
X
Xingjun Wang
ModelScope Team, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China
G
Gongsheng Li
ModelScope Team, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China
Q
Qi Fan
ModelScope Team, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China
Y
Yunlin Mao
ModelScope Team, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China
L
Luyan Su
ModelScope Team, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China
Yingda Chen
Yingda Chen
Alibaba Group, Microsoft