🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses negative transfer and over-consensus bias in heterogeneous multi-task collaboration for distributed semantic communication by proposing a personalized framework. The approach employs policy-driven routing to disentangle features and utilizes a communication aggregation protocol to calibrate the consensus matrix, thereby mitigating interference. Furthermore, a closed-form solution for optimal aggregation depth is derived to balance the variance-bias trade-off. This work reveals a topology-mixed U-shaped pattern and establishes a unified Lyapunov drift analysis theory. Experiments on the NYU-v2 dataset demonstrate a 4.77% improvement in global performance, significantly outperforming baselines such as FedAvg and validating the method's effectiveness and robustness in handling heterogeneous collaborative tasks within distributed semantic communication systems.
📝 Abstract
Collaborative training in distributed semantic communication (DSC) networks typically relies on decentralized federated learning (DFL). However, pushing topology-agnostic aggregation into heterogeneous, multi-task environments creates a fundamental bottleneck: it drives negative transfer and overconsensus bias (OCB). This paper introduces a personalized DSC framework that cuts off this cross-task interference. At the node level, a policy-driven multi-path routing mechanism separates task-specific features from shared representations to preserve local fidelity. Across the network, we deploy a "communicationwhile- aggregation" protocol. It calibrates a column-stochastic consensus matrix using task affinities. This limits the system to absorbing complementary knowledge while actively blocking mismatched parameter updates. To bound the convergence, we derive a unified Lyapunov drift analysis. We reveal a strict Ushaped trade-off: deeper topological mixing reduces variance but amplifies structural OCB. Resolving this tension yields a closed-form expression for the optimal aggregation depth. We evaluate the proposed framework on NYU-v2, where the results reveal a clear trade-off between insufficient aggregation and excessive topological mixing. At the analytically derived optimal aggregation depth, our method achieves a 4.77% global relative improvement over the no-aggregation baseline and outperforms decentralized FedAvg, FedAMP, and heuristic max aggregation. We further evaluate the framework on Taskonomy and imperfect wireless links to examine the effects of network-size variation and wireless-link reliability.