🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the limited generalization of outdoor UAV navigation and functional constraints of LLM-based agents by proposing the LAPF framework. This method establishes a closed-loop cognitive architecture integrating perception, memory, and planning, which couples hazard detection with bounded corrective actions via chain-of-thought reasoning and dynamically optimizes waypoint decisions based on environmental feedback. Evaluated on the UAVScenes dataset, the framework achieves 98.1% path efficiency, representing a 15.6% improvement over standard CoT prompting, while ensuring zero collisions and stable near-target flight. These results demonstrate that LAPF significantly enhances adaptive navigation capabilities in complex urban-scale environments, effectively overcoming current limitations in autonomous aerial systems.
📝 Abstract
Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous navigation in complex outdoor environments, where dynamic conditions and mission requirements require intelligent adaptive decision-making. Existing optimization-based, Machine Learning (ML), and Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches often rely on predefined models or task-specific training, limiting their generalization and adaptability in uncertain scenarios. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted approaches offer promising reasoning capabilities but remain constrained by limited agentic functionality, including insufficient memory, planning, and tool interaction mechanisms.This paper proposes an LLM-Agent-Based Path Finder (LAPF) framework for autonomous UAV navigation in town-scale outdoor environments. LAPF extends LLM-assisted navigation by integrating perception, memory, planning, and action modules into a closed-loop cognitive architecture. The proposed agent leverages prior navigation experiences, performs Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, couples each detected hazard to a bounded corrective action, and dynamically refines waypoint decisions based on environmental feedback.The three independent trials per method demonstrate that LAPF achieves mean path lengths of 512.83 m and 506.37 m, compared to the straight-line optimum of 497.33 m, corresponding to path length reductions of 17.2% and 15.6% relative to CoT prompting and absolute path efficiencies of 97.1% and 98.1% in open-field and obstacle-injected scenarios, respectively. Furthermore, LAPF is the only evaluated approach that couples every detected hazard to a bounded, metric-neutral corrective action while maintaining near-goal stability, with zero clamp events in both scenarios, whereas CoT prompting increases from 9.7 to 14.0 events.