A Near-Optimal Polynomial Distance Lemma Over Boolean Slices

๐Ÿ“… 2025-07-03
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work studies the lower bound on the probability that a nonzero polynomial of degree $d$ evaluates to a nonzero value on a Boolean sliceโ€”the set of points in ${0,1}^n$ with Hamming weight exactly $k$โ€”aiming to optimally extend the ODLSZ lemma. Using spectral analysis and polynomial theory over abelian groups, we construct an efficient embedding and sampling mechanism from the Boolean cube to balanced slices. This yields the first near-optimal lower bound on Boolean slices: $(t/n)^d (1 - o_n(1))$, where $t = min{k, n-k}$, substantially improving upon the prior suboptimal bound of $((k/n)(1-k/n))^d$. The new bound matches the performance over the full Boolean cube when $k = n/2$, and holds uniformly for all $k$ satisfying $d leq k leq n-d$. It is tight up to lower-order terms, confirming theoretical optimality and revealing the near-uniform distribution of low-degree polynomials over slices.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
The celebrated Ore-DeMillo-Lipton-Schwartz-Zippel (ODLSZ) lemma asserts that n-variate non-zero polynomial functions of degree d over a field $mathbb{F}$ are non-zero over any "grid" $S^n$ for finite subset $S subseteq mathbb{F}$, with probability at least $max{|S|^{-d/(|S|-1)},1-d/|S|}$ over the choice of random point from the grid. In particular, over the Boolean cube ($S = {0,1} subseteq mathbb{F}$), the lemma asserts non-zero polynomials are non-zero with probability at least $2^{-d}$. In this work we extend the ODLSZ lemma optimally (up to lower-order terms) to "Boolean slices" i.e., points of Hamming weight exactly $k$. We show that non-zero polynomials on the slice are non-zero with probability $(t/n)^{d}(1 - o_{n}(1))$ where $t = min{k,n-k}$ for every $dleq kleq (n-d)$. As with the ODLSZ lemma, our results extend to polynomials over Abelian groups. This bound is tight (upto the error term) as evidenced by degree d multilinear monomials. A particularly interesting case is the "balanced slice" ($k=n/2$) where our lemma asserts that non-zero polynomials are non-zero with roughly the same probability on the slice as on the whole cube. The behaviour of low-degree polynomials over Boolean slices has received much attention in recent years. However, the problem of proving a tight version of the ODLSZ lemma does not seem to have been considered before, except for a recent work of Amireddy, Behera, Paraashar, Srinivasan and Sudan (SODA 2025) who established a sub-optimal bound of approximately $((k/n)cdot(1-(k/n)))^d$ using a proof similar to that of the standard ODLSZ lemma. While the statement of our result mimics that of the ODLSZ lemma, our proof is significantly more intricate and involves spectral reasoning which is employed to show that a natural way of embedding a copy of the Boolean cube inside a balanced Boolean slice is a good sampler.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Extend ODLSZ lemma to Boolean slices optimally
Prove non-zero polynomials on Boolean slices
Analyze low-degree polynomials over Boolean slices
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Extends ODLSZ lemma to Boolean slices optimally
Uses spectral reasoning for proof complexity
Achieves tight probability bounds for polynomials
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
P
Prashanth Amireddy
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
A
Amik Raj Behera
Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Srikanth Srinivasan
Srikanth Srinivasan
Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen
Complexity TheoryPseudorandomness
Madhu Sudan
Madhu Sudan
Gordon McKay Professor of Computer Science, Harvard University