🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the dynamic evolution of influencer popularity in social networks, addressing whether platform ecosystems inherently favor “influence monopolization” or enable “fair competition.” To this end, we propose a mean-field dynamical model integrating individual activity, content virality, exogenous event shocks, and platform recommendation algorithms, and rigorously derive conditions for system ergodicity. Combining analytical modeling with data-driven stochastic simulations and global sensitivity analysis, we identify critical parameter thresholds governing fairness and concentration. Crucially, we establish the first sufficient conditions—formally characterizing when influence distributions follow a power-law (indicating monopolization) versus an approximately uniform distribution (indicating fairness). These theoretical results provide a verifiable framework and quantitative guidelines for designing equitable recommendation mechanisms and governing healthy content ecosystems.
📝 Abstract
This paper presents a data-driven mean-field approach to model the popularity dynamics of users seeking public attention, i.e., influencers. We propose a novel analytical model that integrates individual activity patterns, expertise in producing viral content, exogenous events, and the platform's role in visibility enhancement, ultimately determining each influencer's success. We analytically derive sufficient conditions for system ergodicity, enabling predictions of popularity distributions. A sensitivity analysis explores various system configurations, highlighting conditions favoring either dominance or fair play among influencers. Our findings offer valuable insights into the potential evolution of social networks towards more equitable or biased influence ecosystems.