🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of comprehensive safety benchmarks for omni-modal large language models by introducing the first multi-context safety evaluation framework encompassing audio, visual, and textual modalities. The benchmark comprises 1,196 scenarios and pioneers a minimal-pair mechanism distinguishing safe from unsafe inputs to isolate subtle risk factors. Through controlled experiments and chain-of-thought analysis, this work precisely evaluates model sensitivity to nuanced risks and cross-modal reasoning capabilities. Findings reveal significant deficiencies in current models regarding fine-grained risk identification and multimodal integration. These insights provide critical empirical evidence for advancing safety architectures and training strategies in omni-modal systems, establishing a foundational resource for future research on robust multimodal alignment and risk mitigation in increasingly capable AI systems.
📝 Abstract
Existing multimodal safety benchmarks focus solely on visual inputs and cannot assess Omni Large Language Models (LLMs) that process vision, audio, and text. We introduce MCBench, a benchmark with 1196 scenarios spanning four safety categories that require integrating multiple modalities for accurate safety assessment. Each unsafe scenario is paired with a minimally different safe counterpart to assess model sensitivity. Our evaluations of state-of-the-art models reveal significant challenges. Omni LLMs struggle with subtle or non-physical risks but perform better when salient visual or acoustic cues are present. Analysis of reasoning traces shows that, although models can extract modality-specific information, they often fail to integrate these cues effectively for safety judgments. Our findings reveal that current Omni LLMs lack robust cross-modal reasoning in safety-critical settings, underscoring the need for improved architectures and training strategies for multimodal safety.