Open-Weight Masked Introspection: Measuring What Language Models Can Report About Their Own Computation

📅 2026-08-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究通过Open-Weight Masked Introspection框架测试了八个语言模型是否能报告自身计算变化,发现现有模型无法有效区分真实与虚假干预。
📝 Abstract
Are frontier models able to introspect about their internal states? Recent work suggests that under certain conditions a complex enough model can audit its own internals, call out what changed, and report back confidently about it. We tested that claim on eight open-weight models from seven families and found no such ability: asked whether their own computation had been altered, none answered better than chance. To test it we built Open-Weight Masked Introspection (OWMI), a framework that intervenes on residual-stream sites, attention heads and sparse-autoencoder features, then interrogates the model about the change against the null conditions an answer has to beat: sham runs where nothing was altered, impact-matched random perturbations, and a text-only observer that sees only the visible output. Over 78,000 measurements, no model's report discriminates a real intervention from a sham beyond chance (AUROC ~0.5007), and an equivalence test bounds the effect below 0.15 percentage points of AUROC. Surprisingly, all the information needed is in the models. A model fine-tuned to report this class of intervention reaches near-perfect recovery on held-out directions, and a linear probe recovers intervention presence from the same activations at 75% to 95.8% accuracy, sharpening to no held-out error at the last layer before the model speaks. In one model the signal surfaces in the confidence rather than the words: its yes-or-no report never varies, while the confidence attached to it separates intervention from sham at AUROC 0.647. The failure sits in the path from internal state to verbal report, so oversight that reads a model's own testimony needs validating against an internal reference. While our results show the inability of current open-weight models to introspect, the debate is not settled for future models.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

introspection
internal states
language models
open-weight models
self-reporting
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Open-Weight Masked Introspection
Residual-stream Sites
Attention Heads
Sparse-autoencoder Features
Internal State Reflection
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.