🤖 AI Summary
Existing RL benchmarks predominantly rely on idealized, fully observable, and stationary simulated environments, failing to capture core challenges of real-world deployment—namely, large state-action spaces, non-stationary dynamics, and partial observability.
Method: We introduce the first systematic benchmark suite explicitly designed to model real-world complexity, incorporating non-stationary dynamics, constrained observation mechanisms, and high-dimensional decision spaces to construct a challenging yet representative evaluation platform. The suite supports unified training and assessment of diverse RL algorithms.
Contribution/Results: Experiments demonstrate that mainstream RL algorithms exhibit substantially degraded performance on this benchmark—performing comparably to rule-based baselines—thereby validating its discriminative power. The results highlight critical limitations of current methods and reveal concrete directions for advancing RL toward practical deployment, including robustness to environmental non-stationarity, effective credit assignment under partial observability, and scalable policy optimization in high-dimensional action spaces.
📝 Abstract
In recent years, emph{Reinforcement Learning} (RL) has made remarkable progress, achieving superhuman performance in a wide range of simulated environments. As research moves toward deploying RL in real-world applications, the field faces a new set of challenges inherent to real-world settings, such as large state-action spaces, non-stationarity, and partial observability. Despite their importance, these challenges are often underexplored in current benchmarks, which tend to focus on idealized, fully observable, and stationary environments, often neglecting to incorporate real-world complexities explicitly. In this paper, we introduce exttt{Gym4ReaL}, a comprehensive suite of realistic environments designed to support the development and evaluation of RL algorithms that can operate in real-world scenarios. The suite includes a diverse set of tasks that expose algorithms to a variety of practical challenges. Our experimental results show that, in these settings, standard RL algorithms confirm their competitiveness against rule-based benchmarks, motivating the development of new methods to fully exploit the potential of RL to tackle the complexities of real-world tasks.