Tight Additive Sensitivity on LZ-style Compressors and String Attractors

📅 2025-06-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

226K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the worst-case additive sensitivity of string repetitiveness measures under single-character edits. Specifically, it analyzes how γ (minimum attractor size), b (minimum bidirectional scheme size), and three Lempel–Ziv compression measures—LZSS, LZ-End, and LZ78—change when one character is inserted, deleted, or substituted. The work establishes the first tight bounds: Θ(√n) for γ and b; Θ(n²/³) for LZSS and LZ-End; and Θ(n) for LZ78. Methodologically, it combines combinatorial construction with compression-theoretic analysis, achieving matching upper and lower bounds via explicit adversarial examples and rigorous upper-bound proofs. The results fully characterize the edit sensitivity of these fundamental repetitiveness measures, resolving several long-standing open problems. Moreover, this work provides the first systematic theoretical framework for analyzing the robustness of string compression under small perturbations.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The worst-case additive sensitivity of a string repetitiveness measure $c$ is defined to be the largest difference between $c(w)$ and $c(w')$, where $w$ is a string of length $n$ and $w'$ is a string that can be obtained by performing a single-character edit operation on $w$. We present $O(sqrt{n})$ upper bounds for the worst-case additive sensitivity of the smallest string attractor size $γ$ and the smallest bidirectional scheme size $b$, which match the known lower bounds $Ω(sqrt{n})$ for $γ$ and $b$ [Akagi et al. 2023]. Further, we present matching upper and lower bounds for the worst-case additive sensitivity of the Lempel-Ziv family - $Θ(n^{frac{2}{3}})$ for LZSS and LZ-End, and $Θ(n)$ for LZ78.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Study worst-case additive sensitivity of string repetitiveness measures
Establish upper bounds for sensitivity of string attractor size
Derive bounds for Lempel-Ziv family sensitivity variations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

O(√n) bounds for string attractor sensitivity
Matching bounds for bidirectional scheme size
Θ(n^(2/3)) and Θ(n) for LZSS and LZ78
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.