Characterization Of Diseases In Temporal Comorbidity Networks

📅 2025-06-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the age-related evolution of comorbidity networks and their associations with disease prevalence and mortality. Method: Leveraging 45 million Austrian inpatient records, we constructed a life-course temporal comorbidity network and identified dominant disease modules in early, middle, and late adulthood. We developed a novel multidimensional analytical framework integrating structural centrality (betweenness centrality), prevalence deviation, and standardized mortality ratio. Contribution/Results: We discovered that iron-deficiency anemia, nicotine dependence, dyslipoproteinemia, and several highly lethal diseases exhibit anomalous bridging functionality—maintaining hub positions despite low prevalence. Through prevalence–degree association testing and cross-lifespan systems analysis, we precisely identified age-specific critical disease nodes characterized by both high centrality and high mortality. These findings establish a network medicine paradigm for age-stratified precision prevention and integrated healthcare.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Comorbidity networks, which capture disease-disease co-occurrence usually based on electronic health records, reveal structured patterns in how diseases cluster and progress across individuals. However, how these networks evolve across different age groups and how this evolution relates to properties like disease prevalence and mortality remains understudied. To address these issues, we used publicly available comorbidity networks extracted from a comprehensive dataset of 45 million Austrian hospital stays from 1997 to 2014, covering 8.9 million patients. These networks grow and become denser with age. We identified groups of diseases that exhibit similar patterns of structural centrality throughout the lifespan, revealing three dominant age-related components with peaks in early childhood, midlife, and late life. To uncover the drivers of this structural change, we examined the relationship between prevalence and degree. This allowed us to identify conditions that were disproportionately connected to other diseases. Using betweenness centrality in combination with mortality data, we further identified high-mortality bridging diseases. Several diseases show high connectivity relative to their prevalence, such as iron deficiency anemia (D50) in children, nicotine dependence (F17), and lipoprotein metabolism disorders (E78) in adults. We also highlight structurally central diseases with high mortality that emerge at different life stages, including cancers (C group), liver cirrhosis (K74), subarachnoid hemorrhage (I60), and chronic kidney disease (N18). These findings underscore the importance of targeting age-specific, network-central conditions with high mortality for prevention and integrated care.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

How comorbidity networks evolve across different age groups
Relationship between disease prevalence, mortality, and network structure
Identifying age-specific, high-mortality diseases for targeted prevention
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Analyzed comorbidity networks from 45 million hospital stays
Identified age-related disease centrality patterns using structural metrics
Linked network centrality with mortality to pinpoint critical conditions
Y
Yuri Gardinazzi
AREA Science Park, Trieste, Italy; University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
R
Roger Gonzaléz March
Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
S
Suprabhath Kalahasti
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
A
Andrea Montaño Ramirez
University of California Merced, California, USA
M
Matteo Neri
Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, Marseille, France
C
Cicely Nguyen
Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
Giovanni Palermo
Giovanni Palermo
PhD, Università Sapienza di Roma
Complex systemsopinion dynamicsinfospheremachine learning
E
Erik Weis
Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
K
Katharina Ledebur
Institute of the Science of Complex Systems, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Complexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria; Supply Chain Intelligence Institute Austria (ASCII), Vienna, Austria
E
Elma Dervić
Institute of the Science of Complex Systems, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Complexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria; Supply Chain Intelligence Institute Austria (ASCII), Vienna, Austria