A Risk-Aware UAV-Edge Service Framework for Wildfire Monitoring and Emergency Response

📅 2026-02-23
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the joint optimization of UAV trajectories, fleet size, and edge service deployment for wildfire monitoring by proposing a risk-aware UAV-edge协同 framework. The framework uniquely integrates historical fire risk data, edge server load, and path planning into a unified model, identifying high-risk zones through fire-history-weighted clustering. It minimizes end-to-end response time via QoS-aware task allocation, 2-opt path optimization, adaptive fleet scheduling, and a dynamic emergency rerouting mechanism. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and greedy baselines, the proposed approach reduces average response time by 70.6–84.2%, decreases energy consumption by 73.8–88.4%, and shrinks required fleet size by 26.7–42.1%. Furthermore, emergency responses are completed within 233 seconds—well under the 300-second deadline—without compromising routine operations.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Wildfire monitoring demands timely data collection and processing for early detection and rapid response. UAV-assisted edge computing is a promising approach, but jointly minimizing end-to-end service response time while satisfying energy, revisit time, and capacity constraints remains challenging. We propose an integrated framework that co-optimizes UAV route planning, fleet sizing, and edge service provisioning for wildfire monitoring. The framework combines fire-history-weighted clustering to prioritize high-risk areas, Quality of Service (QoS)-aware edge assignment balancing proximity and computational load, 2-opt route optimization with adaptive fleet sizing, and a dynamic emergency rerouting mechanism. The key insight is that these subproblems are interdependent: clustering decisions simultaneously shape patrol efficiency and edge workloads, while capacity constraints feed back into feasible configurations. Experiments show that the proposed framework reduces average response time by 70.6--84.2%, energy consumption by 73.8--88.4%, and fleet size by 26.7--42.1% compared to GA, PSO, and greedy baselines. The emergency mechanism responds within 233 seconds, well under the 300-second deadline, with negligible impact on normal operations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

wildfire monitoring
UAV-edge computing
response time minimization
resource constraints
emergency response
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

risk-aware UAV-edge framework
fire-history-weighted clustering
QoS-aware edge assignment
adaptive fleet sizing
dynamic emergency rerouting
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yulun Huang
Quantum Cloud Computing and Distributed Systems (qCLOUDS) Laboratory, School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Z
Zhiyu Wang
Quantum Cloud Computing and Distributed Systems (qCLOUDS) Laboratory, School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Rajkumar Buyya
Rajkumar Buyya
School of Computing and Information Systems, The Uni of Melbourne; Fellow of IEEE & Academia Europea
Cloud ComputingData CentersEdge ComputingInternet of ThingsQuantum Computing