Reconsidering Explicit Longitudinal Mammography Alignment for Enhanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction

📅 2025-06-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the optimal paradigm for explicit image alignment in longitudinal mammography-based breast cancer risk prediction, focusing on two critical design choices: alignment space (input vs. representation space) and optimization strategy (joint vs. independent). We propose performing image-level explicit alignment in the input space via deformable registration and optimizing the alignment and risk prediction tasks independently. Experiments demonstrate that joint optimization in the representation space degrades alignment quality, whereas our decoupled approach significantly improves both deformation field accuracy and risk prediction performance. Comparative evaluations against implicit alignment methods—including Transformer-based architectures—confirm the superiority of explicit input-space alignment. Our method achieves higher risk prediction accuracy in long-term screening scenarios. The implementation is publicly available.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Regular mammography screening is essential for early breast cancer detection. Deep learning-based risk prediction methods have sparked interest to adjust screening intervals for high-risk groups. While early methods focused only on current mammograms, recent approaches leverage the temporal aspect of screenings to track breast tissue changes over time, requiring spatial alignment across different time points. Two main strategies for this have emerged: explicit feature alignment through deformable registration and implicit learned alignment using techniques like transformers, with the former providing more control. However, the optimal approach for explicit alignment in mammography remains underexplored. In this study, we provide insights into where explicit alignment should occur (input space vs. representation space) and if alignment and risk prediction should be jointly optimized. We demonstrate that jointly learning explicit alignment in representation space while optimizing risk estimation performance, as done in the current state-of-the-art approach, results in a trade-off between alignment quality and predictive performance and show that image-level alignment is superior to representation-level alignment, leading to better deformation field quality and enhanced risk prediction accuracy. The code is available at https://github.com/sot176/Longitudinal_Mammogram_Alignment.git.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Optimizing explicit mammography alignment for better risk prediction
Comparing input vs. representation space alignment effectiveness
Balancing alignment quality and predictive performance trade-offs
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Explicit alignment in representation space
Joint optimization of alignment and risk
Image-level alignment improves prediction accuracy
Solveig Thrun
Solveig Thrun
PhD Fellow at UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Stine Hansen
Stine Hansen
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Machine LearningDeep LearningMedical Image AnalysisComputer Vision
Z
Zijun Sun
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
N
Nele Blum
Fraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized and Cell-Based Medical Engineering IMTE, Lübeck, Germany
S
Suaiba A. Salahuddin
Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
K
Kristoffer Wickstrøm
Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
Elisabeth Wetzer
Elisabeth Wetzer
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Robert Jenssen
Robert Jenssen
Visual Intelligence, UiT The Arctic University of Norway & Norw. Comp. Center & P1 Centre AI, UCPH
Machine learninginformation theoretic learningkernel methodsdeep learninghealth data analytics
M
Maik Stille
Fraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized and Cell-Based Medical Engineering IMTE, Lübeck, Germany
M
Michael Kampffmeyer
Department of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway