🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates whether micro-mobility of movable antennas (MAs) can substitute for macro-mobility of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to enhance physical layer security (PLS) in air-to-ground communications. We propose a two-scale mobility framework that jointly models MA-based fine-grained beam steering and UAV-based coarse-grained trajectory optimization, incorporating localization constraints, kinematic limitations, and a non-convex average secrecy rate maximization algorithm. Our key contribution is establishing the first comparative paradigm between MAs and UAVs for PLS, revealing their complementary performance under energy, latency, and resource constraints: MAs significantly improve secrecy rate under low transmit power or limited antenna array size, whereas UAVs outperform in resource-rich scenarios. Numerical results validate the feasibility and synergistic gains of a hybrid micro–macro mobility architecture, offering a new low-overhead, high-security paradigm for air-to-ground communications.
📝 Abstract
This paper investigates the potential of movable antenna (MA)-enabled micro-mobility to replace UAV-enabled macro-mobility for enhancing physical layer security (PLS) in air-to-ground communications. While UAV trajectory optimization offers high flexibility and Line-of-Sight (LoS) advantages, it suffers from significant energy consumption, latency, and complex trajectory optimization. Conversely, MA technology provides fine-grained spatial reconfiguration (antenna positioning within a confined area) with ultra-low energy overhead and millisecond-scale response, enabling real-time channel manipulation and covert beam steering. To systematically compare these paradigms, we establish a dual-scale mobility framework where a UAV-mounted uniform linear array (ULA) serves as a base station transmitting confidential information to a legitimate user (Bob) in the presence of an eavesdropper (Eve). We formulate non-convex average secrecy rate (ASR) maximization problems for both schemes: 1) MA-based micro-mobility: Jointly optimizing antenna positions and beamforming (BF) vectors under positioning constraints; 2) UAV-based macro-mobility: Jointly optimizing the UAV's trajectory and BF vectors under kinematic constraints. Extensive simulations reveal distinct operational regimes: MA micro-mobility demonstrates significant ASR advantages in low-transmit-power scenarios or under antenna constraints due to its energy-efficient spatial control. Conversely, UAV macro-mobility excels under resource-sufficient conditions (higher power, larger antenna arrays) by leveraging global mobility for optimal positioning. The findings highlight the complementary strengths of both approaches, suggesting hybrid micro-macro mobility as a promising direction for balancing security, energy efficiency, and deployment complexity in future wireless networks.