🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of immediate, adaptive feedback mechanisms for addressing students’ conceptual misconceptions in current instructional settings. The authors propose a knowledge-enhanced large language model (LLM) approach that analyzes the reasoning embedded in students’ strategic explanations to automatically identify error types and generate non-intrusive, just-in-time conceptual clarification feedback. This method represents the first deployment of a real-time feedback system—integrating expert knowledge with LLM capabilities—in a large-scale university classroom involving over a thousand students. Experimental results demonstrate that student performance in the course improved by more than 80% compared to previous cohorts, and learning trajectory analyses further confirm the system’s effectiveness in facilitating conceptual change.
📝 Abstract
Educational interventions are effective tools for enhancing student learning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) allow for generating adaptive feedback at scale, current studies lack clear methodologies for providing Just-in-Time (JiT) feedback in authentic instructional settings. In this paper, we present a framework that provides adaptive feedback by grounding LLMs with domain-specific expert knowledge. Our approach collects written reasoning logic (strategy essays) from students, analyzes potential error types based on the content of that reasoning, and delivers non-intrusive feedback designed to clarify missing or incorrect concepts. We deploy this framework in a large-scale university course (N > 1000), where it improved student performance by over 80% compared to previous semesters. Lastly, we validate the framework's pedagogical utility by analyzing the learning trajectories; we demonstrate how iterative conversations with LLM facilitate shifting one's misconception to correct understanding.