Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

📅 2026-09-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究解决了非平稳环境中预测误差归因问题,通过贝叶斯和逆贝叶斯推理方法区分并形式化了惊讶减少与消除策略。
📝 Abstract
In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

non-stationary environments
prediction errors
surprise reduction
surprise nullification
adaptive inference
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Surprise Reduction
Surprise Nullification
Inverse Bayesian Inference
Adaptive Inference
Non-stationary Environments
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Shuji Shinohara
Shuji Shinohara
University of Tokyo
D
Daiki Morita
School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan
Yoshihiro Nakajima
Yoshihiro Nakajima
大阪公立大学、経済学部教授
複雑系、内部観測
T
Takeshi Takano
Department of Advanced Energy, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
M
Masakazu Higuchi
Department of Fundamental Engineering (Information, Electronics, and Optics Course), Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan
Ung-il Chung
Ung-il Chung
University of Tokyo Schools of Engineering and Medicine; Kanagawa University of Human Services
skeletal biology and regenerative medicinebiomaterialsinnovation management
Yukio-Pegio Gunji
Yukio-Pegio Gunji
Professor of Department of Intermedia Art & Science, Waseda University
Internal MeasurementEndo-physicsUnconventional computingAnimal behaviorQuantum Cognitiion