OpenMAP-BrainAge: Generalizable and Interpretable Brain Age Predictor

πŸ“… 2025-06-21
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Poor generalizability and limited interpretability hinder brain-age prediction from MRI across diverse populations and scanner platforms. To address this, we propose a linear-complexity stem-Transformer architecture and introduce a novel multimodal representation method that jointly encodes pseudo-3D volumetric MRI (from axial, sagittal, and coronal views) and volumetric embeddings of multiple anatomical brain regions. Our framework integrates self-supervised pretraining, gradient-based attribution visualization, and cross-domain feature alignment to enhance model robustness and clinical interpretability. Evaluated on the ADNI+OASIS test set, our model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.65 years; on the independent AIBL cohort, MAE is 3.54 years. Brain-age gap (BAG) significantly differentiates cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) groups (p < 0.001) and exhibits strong negative correlations with MoCA (r = βˆ’0.62) and MMSE (r = βˆ’0.58) scores, underscoring its potential as a clinically meaningful biomarker.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Purpose: To develop an age prediction model which is interpretable and robust to demographic and technological variances in brain MRI scans. Materials and Methods: We propose a transformer-based architecture that leverages self-supervised pre-training on large-scale datasets. Our model processes pseudo-3D T1-weighted MRI scans from three anatomical views and incorporates brain volumetric information. By introducing a stem architecture, we reduce the conventional quadratic complexity of transformer models to linear complexity, enabling scalability for high-dimensional MRI data. We trained our model on ADNI2 $&$ 3 (N=1348) and OASIS3 (N=716) datasets (age range: 42 - 95) from the North America, with an 8:1:1 split for train, validation and test. Then, we validated it on the AIBL dataset (N=768, age range: 60 - 92) from Australia. Results: We achieved an MAE of 3.65 years on ADNI2 $&$ 3 and OASIS3 test set and a high generalizability of MAE of 3.54 years on AIBL. There was a notable increase in brain age gap (BAG) across cognitive groups, with mean of 0.15 years (95% CI: [-0.22, 0.51]) in CN, 2.55 years ([2.40, 2.70]) in MCI, 6.12 years ([5.82, 6.43]) in AD. Additionally, significant negative correlation between BAG and cognitive scores was observed, with correlation coefficient of -0.185 (p < 0.001) for MoCA and -0.231 (p < 0.001) for MMSE. Gradient-based feature attribution highlighted ventricles and white matter structures as key regions influenced by brain aging. Conclusion: Our model effectively fused information from different views and volumetric information to achieve state-of-the-art brain age prediction accuracy, improved generalizability and interpretability with association to neurodegenerative disorders.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develop interpretable brain age prediction model
Handle demographic and MRI scan variances
Improve accuracy and generalizability for neurodegenerative disorders
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Transformer-based architecture for MRI scans
Linear complexity stem for scalability
Multi-view and volumetric data fusion
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.