๐ค AI Summary
This study addresses the challenges blind users face when seeking technical support through accessible online forums and generative AI systems, where information overload, content redundancy, and unreliable responses often exacerbate cognitive load and diminish support efficacy. Through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 14 frequent users, the research systematically compares the practical utility of these two resources in technical assistance scenarios. Qualitative content analysis and thematic coding reveal that forums suffer from topic conflation and fragmented replies, while generative AI frequently produces verbose, hallucinated, or internally inconsistent information. Building on these findings, the work proposes targeted design recommendations to enhance information credibility and cognitive manageability, offering novel insights for accessible humanโcomputer interaction.
๐ Abstract
Accessibility forums and, more recently, generative AI tools have become vital resources for blind users seeking solutions to computer-interaction issues and learning about new assistive technologies, screen reader features, tutorials, and software updates. Understanding user experiences with these resources is essential for identifying and addressing persistent support gaps. Towards this, we interviewed 14 blind users who regularly engage with forums and GenAI tools. Findings revealed that forums often overwhelm users with multiple overlapping topics, redundant or irrelevant content, and fragmented responses that must be mentally pieced together, increasing cognitive load. GenAI tools, while offering more direct assistance, introduce new barriers by producing unreliable answers, including overly verbose or fragmented guidance, fabricated information, and contradictory suggestions that fail to follow prompts, thereby heightening verification demands. Based on these insights, we outlined design opportunities to improve the reliability of assistive resources, aiming to provide blind users with more trustworthy and cognitively-manageable support.