Correlation-Guided Encoder Selection for Multi-Encoder Large Audio-Language Models

📅 2026-09-15
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出CUES方法,通过估计编码器性能间的皮尔逊相关性来选择多编码器大音频-语言模型中的编码器,从而避免冗余表示和计算预算膨胀。
📝 Abstract
Multi-encoder fusion extends Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) beyond speech-centric recognition, but selecting encoders via intuition or exhaustive search often introduces redundant representations and inflates an already constrained compute budget. We propose CUES (Correlation-gUided Encoder Selection), a lightweight heuristic that estimates complementarity through task- and category-level Pearson correlations between encoders' performance profiles, scoring a candidate set from single-encoder evaluations alone--without fusion training during selection. Evaluated on the XARES-LLM benchmark with a frozen SmolLM2-135M backbone (LoRA-adapted) via five-fold cross-validation, CUES consistently identifies the same configuration per track from held-out development splits alone, without using test data for selection. For the broad Track~A suite, CUES selects a cross-family trio (Whisper-medium, mHuBERT-147, and Dasheng-base), achieving a 4.3% relative gain over Whisper-medium (0.771 vs. 0.739). For Track~B text generation, it re-anchors on a focused, speech-only pair (mHuBERT-147 and WavLM-base-plus) and actively abstains from adding a divergent encoder, outperforming mHuBERT-147 by 6.3% (0.589 vs. 0.554). Rather than a failure to scale, this divergence is consistent with a diversity--interference trade-off that CUES navigates per track from correlation signals alone: across the evaluated pool, added cross-family diversity tends toward an inverted-U on broad audio tasks but toward steady degradation on text generation, which favors a focused, speech-anchored set.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Multi-encoder fusion
Redundant representations
Compute budget
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Correlation-Guided
Encoder Selection
Multi-Encoder Fusion
Pearson Correlations
Diversity-Interference Trade-off
🔎 Similar Papers