Ghost-Filled Orders: Detecting and Testing Atomicity Violations in Non-Custodial Prediction Markets

2026-09-15

AI Summary

本文研究了非托管预测市场中的原子性违规问题，通过分析Polymarket案例量化其影响，并提出检测方法以测试其他市场是否也存在相同漏洞。

Abstract

Blockchain based prediction markets combine offchain order management with onchain settlement. This architecture supports user controlled custody, since users keep funds in wallets or smart contracts while submitting signed orders to an offchain order book. However, it creates an atomicity gap. An order may be valid when accepted or matched offchain, but become invalid before the corresponding onchain settlement transaction is executed. This behavior, often called ghost filled orders by the community, can cause trades that appear filled offchain to fail onchain. This paper studies this atomicity gap through a case study of Polymarket. We show how the delay between offchain order acceptance and onchain settlement allows adversaries to invalidate unfavorable orders after observing market outcomes or price movements. We then quantify the scale and financial impact of this behavior over a nine-month period from August 12, 2025, to May 22, 2026, using 1.8 million reverted transactions involving Polymarket official smart contracts. Our analysis separates attacker profit from market and user loss, and develops conservative measurement rules to avoid overclaiming impact. We further develop a methodology for testing other blockchain based prediction markets and apply it to three additional markets. We find that all three are vulnerable to the same class of attack, and that one design enables direct attacker profit. We have reported the findings to all three projects; one project had acknowledged the issue at the time of the study.

Problem

• atomicity gap
• blockchain based prediction markets
• offchain order management
• onchain settlement
• ghost filled orders

Innovation

• atomicity violations
• non-custodial prediction markets
• blockchain
• ghost filled orders
• onchain settlement