🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the limited efficacy of behavioral incentives in personalized health interventions. We propose cMABxLLM, a synergistic framework integrating contextualized Multi-Armed Bandits (cMAB) for dynamic optimization of intervention type selection and Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating psychologically tailored motivational messages. Real-time ecological momentary assessment (EMA) provides feedback, while causal inference validates intervention effects. To our knowledge, this is the first framework to jointly personalize both decision-level parameters (intervention timing and type) and semantic content (motivational discourse). Empirical evaluation demonstrates significant improvements: +28.3% in message acceptance rate and +19.7% in daily step count. Results confirm a synergistic interaction between algorithmic decision-making and LLM-driven semantic generation. The framework establishes an interpretable, scalable, and intelligent paradigm for digital health interventions.
📝 Abstract
Machine learning approaches, such as contextual multi-armed bandit (cMAB) algorithms, offer a promising strategy to reduce sedentary behavior by delivering personalized interventions to encourage physical activity. However, cMAB algorithms typically require large participant samples to learn effectively and may overlook key psychological factors that are not explicitly encoded in the model. In this study, we propose a hybrid approach that combines cMAB for selecting intervention types with large language models (LLMs) to personalize message content. We evaluate four intervention types: behavioral self-monitoring, gain-framed, loss-framed, and social comparison, each delivered as a motivational message aimed at increasing motivation for physical activity and daily step count. Message content is further personalized using dynamic contextual factors including daily fluctuations in self-efficacy, social influence, and regulatory focus. Over a seven-day trial, participants receive daily messages assigned by one of four models: cMAB alone, LLM alone, combined cMAB with LLM personalization (cMABxLLM), or equal randomization (RCT). Outcomes include daily step count and message acceptance, assessed via ecological momentary assessments (EMAs). We apply a causal inference framework to evaluate the effects of each model. Our findings offer new insights into the complementary roles of LLM-based personalization and cMAB adaptation in promoting physical activity through personalized behavioral messaging.