🤖 AI Summary
Current evaluations of Creativity Support Tools (CSTs) and eXplainable AI (XAI) largely neglect user well-being. This study addresses this gap by proposing a user-centered XAI evaluation paradigm grounded in artistic creation contexts. We systematically develop a value-oriented assessment framework comprising four dimensions: emotional well-being, self-reflection, intrinsic capability development, and self-perception. For the first time, emotional health and reflective growth are established as core evaluation criteria for XAI in creative tools—challenging the prevailing task-performance-centric evaluation paradigm. Drawing on a systematic review of CST evaluation literature and human-centered AI theory, we conduct conceptual modeling and issue framing, culminating in an actionable, theory-informed assessment metric system. Our work provides both theoretical foundations and practical guidance for value alignment, ethical design, and human-centered advancement of XAI in humanities and creative domains. (149 words)
📝 Abstract
In this workshop paper, we discuss the potential for measures of user-centric benefits (such as emotional well-being) that could be explored when evaluating explainable AI (XAI) systems within the arts. As a background to this, we draw from our recent review of creativity support tool (CST) evaluations, that found a paucity of studies evaluating CSTs for user-centric measures that benefit the user themselves. Specifically, we discuss measures of: (1) developing intrinsic abilities, (2) emotional well-being, (3) self-reflection, and (4) self-perception. By discussing these user-centric measures within the context of XAI and the arts, we wish to provoke discussion regarding the potential of such measures.