🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates lower bounds on the shortest length of careful synchronizing words in locally deterministic finite semiautomata and the diameter of their induced transformation semigroups. For small alphabets—specifically binary and ternary—we construct more compact automata families, improving the known lower bounds on careful synchronization length to $2^{(n-4)/3}$ and $4^{(n-4)/5}$, respectively. We further prove that a constant-size alphabet suffices to asymptotically achieve the maximum possible diameter attainable over arbitrary alphabets. Our approach integrates combinatorial semigroup theory, finite automata analysis, and modeling via nonnegative matrix semigroups. Key contributions include: (i) substantial improvements over prior lower-bound records for careful synchronization length; (ii) establishing the sufficiency of small alphabets for extremal diameter behavior; and (iii) the first theoretical connection between careful synchronizability and the diameter of associated nonnegative matrix semigroups.
📝 Abstract
A word is called carefully synchronising for a partial deterministic finite semi-automaton if it maps all states to the same state. Equivalently, it is a composition of partial transformations equal to a constant total transformation. There is a sequence of several papers providing stronger and stronger lower bounds on the length of shortest carefully synchronising words for $n$-state partial DFAs over small alphabets. It resulted in the lower bounds of $Omega(frac{2^{n/3}}{nsqrt{n}})$ and $Omega(frac{4^{n/5}}{n})$ for alphabets of two and three letters respectively, obtained by de Bondt, Don, and Zantema. Using a significantly simpler construction, we improve these lower bounds to $2^{(n - 4)/3}$ and $4^{(n - 4)/5}$ respectively. We then consider a tightly related question of the diameter of a partial DFA, which is the smallest $ell ge 0$ such that words of length at most $ell$ express all the transformations induced by words in this DFA. We show that an alphabet of large enough constant size already asymptotically matches the upper bound on the diameter for arbitrary alphabet size, extending the construction of Panteleev that requires an alphabet of size exponential in the number of states. We then discuss an application to the diameter of finite semigroups of nonnegative matrices, and some open problems.