Which Humans? Inclusivity and Representation in Human-Centered AI

📅 2025-06-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The prevailing “human-centered AI” paradigm harbors severe representational biases, with systemic exclusions across Global North–South divides, racial and ethnic groups, gender identities, and persons with disabilities. Method: We develop the first cross-dimensional inclusivity assessment framework, introducing the “explicit centralization of subjecthood” methodology—an integrative approach combining socio-technical analysis, critical algorithm studies, participatory design, policy semantic mining, and comparative global case analysis. Contribution: Our audit of 37 leading AI ethics guidelines reveals that 82% fail to explicitly define the referent of “human,” exposing foundational ambiguities in ethical scope. We produce an actionable inclusivity-by-design checklist, formally adopted by four international AI governance initiatives. This advances AI ethics from abstract normative principles toward structural accountability—centering historically marginalized epistemic positions, institutional power asymmetries, and context-sensitive operationalization of human dignity in AI systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
As AI systems continue to spread and become integrated into many aspects of society, the concept of"human-centered AI"has gained increasing prominence, raising the critical question of which humans are the AI systems to be centered around.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Defining inclusivity in human-centered AI systems
Addressing representation gaps in AI development
Identifying target populations for AI solutions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Inclusive human-centered AI design
Representation diversity in AI systems
Critical analysis of AI inclusivity
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.