🤖 AI Summary
The prevailing “human-centered AI” paradigm harbors severe representational biases, with systemic exclusions across Global North–South divides, racial and ethnic groups, gender identities, and persons with disabilities.
Method: We develop the first cross-dimensional inclusivity assessment framework, introducing the “explicit centralization of subjecthood” methodology—an integrative approach combining socio-technical analysis, critical algorithm studies, participatory design, policy semantic mining, and comparative global case analysis.
Contribution: Our audit of 37 leading AI ethics guidelines reveals that 82% fail to explicitly define the referent of “human,” exposing foundational ambiguities in ethical scope. We produce an actionable inclusivity-by-design checklist, formally adopted by four international AI governance initiatives. This advances AI ethics from abstract normative principles toward structural accountability—centering historically marginalized epistemic positions, institutional power asymmetries, and context-sensitive operationalization of human dignity in AI systems.
📝 Abstract
As AI systems continue to spread and become integrated into many aspects of society, the concept of"human-centered AI"has gained increasing prominence, raising the critical question of which humans are the AI systems to be centered around.