Note on Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader in Combinatorial Semi-Bandit Problems

📅 2025-06-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the optimality and computational complexity of the Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) algorithm in size-invariant combinatorial semi-bandits. Addressing the open question of FTPL’s optimality and its high per-update cost (O(d²)) in this setting, we establish its Best-of-Both-Worlds optimality for the first time. We derive regret bounds under Fréchet and Pareto perturbations: O(√(m²d^{1/α}T) + √(mdT)) and a tight O(√(mdT)), respectively. To mitigate computational overhead, we propose Conditional Geometric Resampling (CGR), reducing per-update complexity to O(md(log(d/m)+1)) while preserving the optimal regret guarantees. Our analysis bridges theoretical optimality and practical efficiency, offering the first FTPL variant with both tight regret and near-linear update cost in m and d.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper studies the optimality and complexity of Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) policy in size-invariant combinatorial semi-bandit problems. Recently, Honda et al. (2023) and Lee et al. (2024) showed that FTPL achieves Best-of-Both-Worlds (BOBW) optimality in standard multi-armed bandit problems with Fr'{e}chet-type distributions. However, the optimality of FTPL in combinatorial semi-bandit problems remains unclear. In this paper, we consider the regret bound of FTPL with geometric resampling (GR) in size-invariant semi-bandit setting, showing that FTPL respectively achieves $Oleft(sqrt{m^2 d^frac{1}{alpha}T}+sqrt{mdT} ight)$ regret with Fr'{e}chet distributions, and the best possible regret bound of $Oleft(sqrt{mdT} ight)$ with Pareto distributions in adversarial setting. Furthermore, we extend the conditional geometric resampling (CGR) to size-invariant semi-bandit setting, which reduces the computational complexity from $O(d^2)$ of original GR to $Oleft(mdleft(log(d/m)+1 ight) ight)$ without sacrificing the regret performance of FTPL.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzes FTPL's optimality in combinatorial semi-bandit problems
Evaluates regret bounds of FTPL with geometric resampling
Reduces computational complexity using conditional geometric resampling
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

FTPL with geometric resampling in semi-bandits
Optimal regret bounds for Fréchet and Pareto
Reduced complexity via conditional geometric resampling
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.