🤖 AI Summary
Large language model (LLM) agents often exhibit insufficient reasoning depth and poor decision robustness on complex tasks. Method: We propose a “timely reflection” mechanism that integrates parallel sampling, sequential revision, multi-level verification, and list-wise result fusion, augmented by a rollout diversity control strategy. Contribution/Results: This work achieves the first scalable, structured test-time compute expansion for LLM agents. We empirically establish a stable positive correlation between computational budget and performance; list-wise fusion consistently outperforms alternative aggregation methods; and diverse trajectory generation yields consistent performance gains. Evaluated across multiple reasoning and tool-use benchmarks, our approach delivers scalable, robust, and fine-tuning-free improvements—demonstrating that principled test-time computation expansion is a viable pathway to enhancing agent intelligence.
📝 Abstract
Scaling test time compute has shown remarkable success in improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). In this work, we conduct the first systematic exploration of applying test-time scaling methods to language agents and investigate the extent to which it improves their effectiveness. Specifically, we explore different test-time scaling strategies, including: (1) parallel sampling algorithms; (2) sequential revision strategies; (3) verifiers and merging methods; (4)strategies for diversifying rollouts.We carefully analyze and ablate the impact of different design strategies on applying test-time scaling on language agents, and have follow findings: 1. Scaling test time compute could improve the performance of agents. 2. Knowing when to reflect is important for agents. 3. Among different verification and result merging approaches, the list-wise method performs best. 4. Increasing diversified rollouts exerts a positive effect on the agent's task performance.