🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the problem of “memory mis-evolution” in intelligent agents during test-time memory adaptation, which can degrade trustworthiness and compromise safety and alignment—even under benign task evolution. To mitigate this issue, the paper introduces TAME, a novel dual-track memory evolution framework that separately optimizes executor and evaluator memories. TAME employs a closed-loop process comprising memory filtering, draft generation, trustworthy refinement, execution feedback, and dual-track updating to enable coordinated memory evolution. Evaluated on the newly proposed Trust-Memevo benchmark—a systematic suite for assessing agent trustworthiness—TAME effectively alleviates memory mis-evolution across diverse task domains, simultaneously enhancing task performance and significantly improving agent trustworthiness and safety.
📝 Abstract
Test-time evolution of agent memory serves as a pivotal paradigm for achieving AGI by bolstering complex reasoning through experience accumulation. However, even during benign task evolution, agent safety alignment remains vulnerable-a phenomenon known as Agent Memory Misevolution. To evaluate this phenomenon, we construct the Trust-Memevo benchmark to assess multi-dimensional trustworthiness during benign task evolution, revealing an overall decline in trustworthiness across various task domains and evaluation settings. To address this issue, we propose TAME, a dual-memory evolutionary framework that separately evolves executor memory to improve task performance by distilling generalizable methodologies, and evaluator memory to refine assessments of both safety and task utility based on historical feedback. Through a closed loop of memory filtering, draft generation, trustworthy refinement, execution, and dual-track memory updating, TAME preserves trustworthiness without sacrificing utility. Experiments demonstrate that TAME mitigates misevolution, achieving a joint improvement in both trustworthiness and task performance.